Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences

Paper Details

Research Paper | March 5, 2022

| Download

Study on the effects of dietary supplementation of inactive dry yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on feed intake, body weight gain and fecal microbiota of crossbreds steers

Kamran Ali, Ihsan Ullah, Hayaz Uddin, Shakira Ghazanfar, Mustansar Ali Ghazanfar

Key Words:

Int. J. Biosci.10(4), 288-294, April 2017

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/20.2.1-20

Certification: IJB 2017 [Generate Certificate]


Livestock industry is showing great interest in the use of feed supplements for improving performance of the farm animal. The objective of this research study was to determine the effect of inactive dry yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on feed intake, average daily weight gain, feed conversion ratio (FCR) and fecal microbiota of crossbreds steers. For this purpose, twelve male steers of cross breed (135±5 kg and 14 to16 months of age) were randomly divided into three equal groups (four animals in each group). In group 1(A-0) steers were fed control diet, group II (B-10) cows were fed control diet plus commercially available yeast at the rate of 10g/d/animal while group III (C-20) steers were fed control diet plus commercially available yeast at the rate of 20g/d/animal. Results showed that feed intake, total weight gain, average daily gain and FCR were significantly (P<0.05) higher in group III as compared to other groups. On the other hand body condition scores were not significantly (P>0.05) effective by yeast supplementation. The outcomes of fecal microbiota study showed that the average fecal population of Lactobacillus (CFU/g) was significantly (P<0.05) higher, while Coliform (CFU/g) was significantly (P<0.05) lower with in group III than in other groups which leads to improved gut health. These results concluded that dietary supplementation of inactive dry yeast has an enhancing effect on growth performance and gut health in the crossbred steers without any adverse effects.


Copyright © 2021
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Study on the effects of dietary supplementation of inactive dry yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on feed intake, body weight gain and fecal microbiota of crossbreds steers

Agazzi A, Tirloni E, Stella S, Maroccolo S, Ripamonti B, Bersani C, Caputo JM, Dellorto V, Rota N, Savoini G. 2014. Effects of species-specific probiotic addition to milk replacer on calf health and performance during the first month of life. Annals of Animal Science 14(1), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2013-0089.

Ahmad S, Hinch G, Prior J, Thomas P, Burrell D. 2012. The role of extension in changing the dairy industry in Pakistan: The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 22(2),113-116.

Arambel MJ, Kent BA. 1990. Effect of yeast culture on nutrient digestibility and milk yield response in early to mid-lactation dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 73, 1560-1563. https://doi.10. 3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78825-X.

Ayad MA, Benallou MS, Saim MA, Smadi MA, Meziane T. 2013. Impact of feeding yeast culture on milk yield, milk components, and blood components in Algerian dairy herds. Journal of Veterinary Science Technology 4, 135-140. https://doi.10.4172/2157-7579.1000135.

Bertin G, Spring P, Fallon R, Earley B. 2005. Benefits of yeast culture (Yea Sacc®1026) supplementation on performance of bull calves. Nutritional Biotechnology in the Feed and Food Industry (Suppl. 1), Lexington, KY, USA pp. 107.

Chaucheryras FG, Fonty G, Bertin P, Gouet S. 1995. In vitro utilization by a ruminal acetogenic bacterium cultivated alone or in association with an Archea methanogen is stimulated by a probiotic strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61, 3466-3467.

Chaucheyras F, Walker ND, Bach A. 2008. Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem: Past, present and future. Animal Feed Science and Technology 145(1), 5-26.

Dawson KA, Newman KE. 1988. Fermentationsin rumen-simulating continuous cultures receiving probiotic supplements. Journal of Animal Science  67, 500.

Denev ST, Peeva P, Radulova N, Stancheva G, Staykova G, Beev G, Todorova P, Tchobanova S. 2007. Yeast Cultures in Ruminant Nutrition. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 357-374.

Desnoyers M, Reverdin S, Bertin G, Duvaux-Ponter C, Sauvant D. 2009. Meta analysis of the influence of (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation on ruminal parameters and milk production of ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 1620-1632. https://doi.10.3168/jds.2008-1414.

Erasmus LJ, Botha PM, Kistner A. 1992. Effect of yeast culture supplement on production, rumen fermentation, and duodenal nitrogen flow in dairy cows. Journal Dairy Science 75, 3056-3065. https://doi.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302 (92)78069-2.

Fallon RJ, Earley B. 2004. Effects of Yea-Sacc ®1026 inclusion on the performance of calves offered ad labium concentrates. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Symposium Nutritional Biotechnology in the Feed and Food Industries. Lexington, KY, USA, May 24-26, pp. 76.

Farah N, Sadia M, Shakira G, Tahir SS, Naseem R, Muhammad I. 2016. Isolation, characterization and application of indigenous lactic acid bacteria in milk fermentation. International Journal of Biosciences 9(6), 415-430. https://doi.org/10.12692/ijb/9.6.415430.

Fortina R,  Battaglini LM, Opsi S, Tassone M, Renna M. 2011. Effects of Inactivated Yeast Culture on Rumen Fermentation and Performance of Mid-Lactation Dairy cow. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 10(5), 577-580.https://doi.10.3923/javaa.2011.577.580.

Hossain FM, Islam MM, Aara M, Iliyas N. 2014. Supplementing probiotics (saccharomyces cerevisiae) in multiparous crossbred cows ration provoke milk yield and composition. Online Journal of Animal Feed Resources 4, 18-24.

Lesmeister KE, Heinrichs AJ, Gabler MT. 2004. Effects of supplemental yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) culture on rumen development, growth characteristics, and blood parameters in neonatal dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Sciences 87(6), 1832-1839. https://doi.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302 (04)73340-8.

Magalha FS, Lima FS, Branco AF, Yoon I, Santos JE. 2007. Effect of feeding yeast culture on performance health and immunocompetence of dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science91, 1497-1509. https://doi.10.3168/jds.2007-0582.

Martin SA, Nisbet DJ. 1992. Effect of direct-fed microbes on rumen microbial fermentation. Journal of Dairy Science (75), 1736-1744. https://doi.10. 3168/jds.S0022-0302 (92)77932-6..

Mutsvangwa T, Edwards IE, Topps IE, Paterson GFM. 1992. The effect of dietary inclusion of yeast culture (Yea-sac) on patterns of rumen fermentation, food intake and growth of intensively fed bulls. Animal Production 55, 35. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S0003356100037247.

Poppy GD, Rabiee AR, Lean IJ, Sanchez WK, Dorton KL, Morley PS. 2012. A meta-analysis of the effects of feeding yeast culture produced by anaerobic fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on milk production of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 95(10), 6027-6041. https://doi.10. 3168/jds.2012-5577.

Sara A, Cighi V, Odagui A, Sichet C. 2004. The effect of Yea-Sacc ®1026 on performance in sheep. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Symposium, Nutritional Biotechnology in the Feed and Food Industries: May 24-26: 76.

Shakira G, Anjum MI, Azim A, Ahmed I. 2015. Effects of dietary supplementation of yeast (saccharomyces cerevisiae) culture on growth performance, blood parameters, nutrient digestibility and fecal flora of dairy heifers. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 25(1), 53-59.

Shakira G, Mirza IH, Latif A. 2013. Scope of common DNA based methods for the study of rumen bacterial population. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Sciences 41(2), 141-146.

Steel RGD, Torrie JH. 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics; A Biometrical Approach. 3rd Ed, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.

Sune RW. 1998. The yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) strain 1026 as manipulator of ruminal fermentation in relation to milk yield and composition. Scientific Papers 3(1), 70-79.

Szucs JP, Suli A, Halasz T, Arany A, Bodor Z, 2013. Effect of live yeast culture Saccharomyces cerevisiae on milk production and some blood parameters. Scientific Papers Animal Sciences and Biotechnologies 46(1), 40-44.

Uyeno Y, Shigemori S, Shimosato T. 2015. Effect of Probiotics/Prebiotics on Cattle Health and Productivity. Microbes Environments 30(2), 126-132. https:// doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME14176.

Uyeno Y, Kiyoshi A, Toshiya H, Hiroshi Y, Hiroaki Y, Tsuneko Y, Kenji K, Minoru I, Shiro K, Makoto H. 2017. Effects of supplementing an active dry yeast product on rumen microbial community composition and on subsequent rumen fermentation of lactating cows in the mid‐to‐late lactation period. Animal Science Journal  88(1), 119-124. https://doi: 10.1111 /asj.12612.

Williams P, Tait G, Innes GM, Newbold CJ. 1991. Effects of the inclusion of yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiaeplus growth medium) in the diet of dairy cows on milk yield and forage degradation and fermentation patterns in the rumen of steers. Journal of Animal Sciences 69, 3016-3026.

Yalcın S, Suzan Y, Pinar C, Arif O, Cemalettin B, Onder E. 2011. The nutritive value of live yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and its effect on milk yield, milk composition and some blood parameters of dairy cows. Asian-Australas Journal of Animal Sciences 24(10), 1377-1385. https://doi.org/ 10.5713/ajas.2011.11060.


Style Switcher

Select Layout
Chose Color
Chose Pattren
Chose Background