Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences

Paper Details

Research Paper | March 5, 2022

| Download

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in livestock through farm management and nutrition

Kremlin Mark B. Ampode

Key Words:

Int. J. Biosci.20(6), 261-268, June 2022

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/20.2.1-20

Certification: IJB 2022 [Generate Certificate]


The livestock sector is one of the key sources of protein, and demand for milk, meat, and eggs is predicted to increase by 30%, 60%, and 80% by 2050. The animals’ stocking density rate might be increased, or the current stock output could be improved. This sector, however, is a major source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and is regarded as a global threat. The agriculture sector is the largest contributor to anthropogenic global warming, accounting for 53% of N2O, 44% of CH4, and 5% of CO2. It is recommended that animals be managed using genetic selections in intensive management practices, with milk yields of up to 50 to 55 percent. Animal dung should be moved outside regularly to minimize N2O emissions by 41% and CH4 gas emissions by 55%. In contrast, nutritional manipulation increased animal productivity and reduced CH4 gas emissions by 40% to 75%, depending on the degree of intervention. The antibacterial characteristics of plants’ secondary compounds, which kill bacteria in the rumen, have the potential to reduce gas emissions. While lowering organic matter fermentation, fiber digestibility, and thus the methanogenic pathway, as well as direct inhibition of methanogenesis in the rumen by hydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids, causes fat to suppress CH4. Several mitigation measures could be used to address the impact of GHGs like CH4 and N2O in the cattle sector.


Copyright © 2021
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in livestock through farm management and nutrition

Ali MZ, Carlile G, Giasuddin M. 2020. Impact of global climate change on livestock health: Bangladesh perspective. Open Veterinary Journal 10(2), 178-188.

Ampode KM. 2019. Plant secondary compounds as an alternative anthelmintic in mitigating gastrointestinal nematodes in ruminants: a review. International Journal of Biosciences 14(1), 598-603.

Babinszky L, Halas V, Verstegen MW. 2011. Impacts of climate change on animal production and quality of animal food products. Climate change socioeconomic effects. Rijeka: In Tech, 165-190.

Battini F, Agostini A, Boulamanti AK, Giuntoli J, Amaducci S. 2014. Mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production via anaerobic digestion of manure: Case study of a dairy farm in the Po Valley. Science of the Total Environment481, 196-208.

Beauchemin KA, Kreuzer M, O’mara F, McAllister TA. 2008. Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(2), 21-27.

Benchaar C, Pomar C, Chiquette J. 2001. Evaluation of dietary strategies to reduce methane production in ruminants: a modelling approach. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 81(4), 563-574.

Bodas R, Prieto N, García-González R, Andrés S, Giráldez FJ, López S. 2012. Manipulation of rumen fermentation and methane production with plant secondary metabolites. Animal Feed Science and Technology176(1-4), 78-93.

Borhan MS, Mukhtar S, Capareda S, Rahman S, Rebellon LFM. 2012. Greenhouse gas emissions from housing and manure management systems at confined livestock operations. Waste management—an integrated vision. Rijeka (Croatia): InTech, 259-296.

Chauhan DS, Ghosh N. 2014. Impact of climate change on livestock production: A review. Journal of Animal Research 4(2), 223.

Danielsson R, Dicksved J, Sun L, Gonda H, Müller B, Schnürer A, Bertilsson J. 2017. Methane production in dairy cows correlates with rumen methanogenic and bacterial community structure. Frontiers in Microbiology 8, 226.

FAO. (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 1986. Farm structures in tropical climates: Animal environmental requirements.

Garnett T. 2009. Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: impacts and options for policy makers. Environmental Science & Policy 12(4), 491-503.

Gerber P, Vellinga T, Opio C, Steinfeld H. 2011. Productivity gains and greenhouse gas emissions intensity in dairy systems. Livestock Science139(1-2), 100-108.

Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Tempio G. 2013. Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

Grainger C, Beauchemin KA. 2011. Can enteric methane emissions from ruminants be lowered without lowering their production.Animal Feed Science and Technology 166, 308-320.

Grossi G, Goglio P, Vitali A, Williams AG. 2019. Livestock and climate change: impact of livestock on climate and mitigation strategies. Animal Frontiers 9(1), 69-76.

Hahn GL, Mader TL, Eigenberg RA. 2003. Perspective on development of thermal indices for animal studies and management. European Federation of Animal Science Technical Series 7, 31-44.

Hansen, PJ. 2007. Exploitation of genetic and physiological determinants of embryonic resistance to elevated temperature to improve embryonic survival in dairy cattle during heat stress. Theriogenology 68, S242-S249.

Haque M. 2018. Dietary manipulation: a sustainable way to mitigate methane emissions from ruminants. Journal of Animal Science and Technology 60(1), 1-10.

Henry B, Charmley E, Eckard R, Gaughan JB, Hegarty R. 2012. Livestock production in a changing climate: adaptation and mitigation research in Australia. Crop and Pasture Science 63(3), 191-202.

Hook SE, Wright ADG, McBride BW. 2010. Methanogens: methane producers of the rumen and mitigation strategies. Archaea, 2010.

Hristov AN, Oh J, Lee C, Meinen R, Montes F, Ott T, Oosting SJ. 2013. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production-A review of technical options for non-CO2 emissions. FAO.

IPCC. 2013. Climate Change 2013. The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P. M. Midgley, ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY.

Johnson KA, Johnson DE. 1995. Methane emissions from cattleJournal of Animal Science 73(8), 2483-2492.

Knapp JR, Laur GL, Vadas PA, Weiss WP, Tricarico JM. 2014. Invited review: Enteric methane in dairy cattle production: Quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions. Journal of Dairy Science 97(6), 3231-3261.

Koubkova M, Knizkova I, Kunc P, Hartlova H, Flusser J, Dolezal O. 2002. Influence of high environmental temperatures and evaporative cooling on some physiological, hematological and biochemical parameters in high-yielding dairy cows. Czech Journal of Animal Science 47, 309-318.

Llonch P, Haskell MJ, Dewhurst RJ, Turner, SP. 2017. Current available strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in livestock systems: an animal welfare perspective. Animal 11(2), 274-284

Lynch J. 2019. Availability of disaggregated greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle production: a systematic review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 76, 69–78.

Mohankumar Sajeev EP, Winiwarter W, Amon B. 2018. Greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from different stages of liquid manure management chains: abatement options and emission interactions. Journal of Environmental Quality 47(1), 30-41.

Mondal S, Reddy IJ. 2018. Impact of climate change on livestock production. In Biotechnology for sustainable agriculture. Woodhead Publishing 235-256.

Montes F, Meinen R, Dell C, Rotz A, Hristov AN, Oh J, Dijkstra J. 2013. SPECIAL TOPICS—mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: II. A review of manure management mitigation options. Journal of Animal Science91(11), 5070-5094.

Mosier AR, Duxbury JM, Freney JR, Heinemeyer O, Minami K, Johnson DE. 1998. Mitigating agricultural emissions of methane. Climatic Change 40(1), 39-80.

Moss AR, Jouany JP, Newbold J. 2000. Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. In Annales de zootechnie 49(3), 231-253.

Newell Price JP, Harris D, Taylor M, Williams JR, Anthony SG, Duethmann D, Misselbrook T H. 2011. An inventory of mitigation methods and guide to their effects on diffuse water pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and ammonia emissions from agriculture. Food and Rural Affairs, UK.

O’Mara FP. 2011. The significance of livestock as a contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions today and in the near future. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166, 7-15.

Petersen SO, Blanchard M, Chadwick D, Del Prado A, Edouard N, Mosquera J, Sommer, SG. 2013. Manure management for greenhouse gas mitigation. Animal 7(2), 266-282.

Pryce JE, Bell MJ. 2017. The impact of genetic selection on greenhouse-gas emissions in Australian dairy cattle. Animal Production Science 57(7), 1451-1456.

Rojas-Downing MM, Nejadhashemi AP, Harrigan T, Woznicki SA. 2017. Climate change and livestock: Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. Climate Risk Management 16, 145-163.

Sejian V, Lal R, Lakritz J, Ezeji T. 2011. Measurement and prediction of enteric methane emission. International Journal of Biometeorology 55(1), 1-16.

Sejian V, Bhatta R, Malik PK, Madiajagan B, Al-Hosni YAS, Sullivan M, Gaughan J. 2016. Livestock as sources of greenhouse gases and its significance to climate change. Greenhouse Gases, 243-259.

Shook GE. 2006. Major advances in determining appropriate selection goalsJournal of Dairy Science 89(4), 1349-1361.

VanRaden PM. 2004. Invited review: Selection on net merit to improve lifetime profit. Journal of Dairy Science 87(10), 3125-3131.

West JW. 2003. Effects of heat-stress on production in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 86(6), 2131-2144.


Style Switcher

Select Layout
Chose Color
Chose Pattren
Chose Background